Axiological

I zoom in on humans and how they interact in different contexts and power/epistemic/axiological structures. ❋ Unknown (2009)

Now, then, “DISORDERS OF MIND” can interfere with moral actions as revealed by axiological science science of values and morals as opposed to neuroscience grounded in natural science. ❋ Unknown (2010)

The “disorders of mind” are revealed in the axiological structure and function of mind rather than the molecular structure and function of brain alone. ❋ Unknown (2010)

There is broad consensus that the normativity of meaning/content involves norms for action, but there at least does not seem to be anything inconsistent about construing it in purely axiological terms. ❋ Glüer, Kathrin (2009)

But this normative character of moral judgment falls broadly speaking under two categories, the axiological and the deontic. ❋ Unknown (2009)

I think property rights are an axiological concept. ❋ Unknown (2009)

Consequently, the deontic sphere of morality is often taken as describing the minimal conditions of morality, the basic requirements of social morality that secure a just society, while the axiological sphere aims at higher ideals which can only be commended and recommended but not strictly required. ❋ Unknown (2009)

To insist upon determining questions as a “Latina woman” is inevitably to adopt an axiological language “better conclusion,” “preferably Hispanic”, because it moves personal and social associations and interests ahead of any rational methodology. ❋ Unknown (2009)

The alternative to an axiological formulation is a deontological formulation. ❋ Tooley, Michael (2009)

The problem, in short, is that any axiological formulation of the argument from evil, as it stands, is incomplete in a crucial respect, since it fails to make explicit how a failure to bring about good states of affairs, or a failure to prevent bad states of affairs, entails that one is acting in a morally wrong way. ❋ Tooley, Michael (2009)

There are of course, axiological differences between corporate and academic experiments. ❋ Unknown (2007)

According to Campbell, the axiological foundation of the crime against humanity ¦ lies in a conception of a fundamental trauma to a social body, which consists of the denial of the humanity of others. ❋ Whisnant, Rebecca (2009)

Supererogation lies at the intersection of the axiological and the deontic, the ˜good™ and the ❋ Unknown (2009)

From a philosophical perspective, the world can be decomposed into ontological, epistemological, and axiological components. ❋ Unknown (2009)

The axiological face of morality, unlike its deontic counterpart, is open-ended. ❋ Unknown (2009)

Jim Jones, whose image of himself as a leader/savior seemed rooted, as appears the case with Limbaugh, in an axiological sense of paranoia and insecurity. ❋ Unknown (2009)

Whereas the object of axiological assessment is primarily states of affairs and human agents, the object of deontic evaluation is human actions. ❋ Unknown (2009)

Then, the axiological differences become moot, as does the value of the research itself. — ❋ Unknown (2007)

In its deontic nature, morality is closely associated with the legal, while the axiological is closer to the ideal or the ideological (sometimes referred to as “the ethical”). ❋ Unknown (2009)