Bicameralism

The greatest evil of bicameralism is that the bills are written by conference committees instead of legislatures. ❋ Unknown (2010)

Also, I strongly agree that bicameralism is not as clever as we’re taught in Schoolhouse Rock. ❋ Unknown (2010)

These decision making processes include features such as bicameralism, co-decision mechanisms between central and local government or the judicial review of executive decisions and legislation. ❋ Eberhard Kienle (2010)

– If the House does not pass exactly the same bill the Senate passed, then the bicameralism requirement is not met – ❋ Unknown (2010)

In order to satisfy the requirements of bicameralism and presentment, the two houses must pass bills with identical language. ❋ Unknown (2010)

If the Senate passes X, the House passes X + Y, the Senate passes Y, and the President signs X + Y, bicameralism and presentment have been satisfied as to every jot and tittle. ❋ Unknown (2010)

You must pass what the Senate passed (word for word) to satisfy bicameralism. ❋ Unknown (2010)

The procedure complies with Clinton v. City of New York and the bicameralism requirements. ❋ Unknown (2010)

– If he does both, signs the Senate bill, then signs a reconciliation bill, I for one do not see how the bicameralism clause is violated. ❋ Unknown (2010)

All the bicameralism clause does, on its own, is require that public law be agreed to by both chambers. ❋ Unknown (2010)

These are sometimes collectively referred to as the requirements of bicameralism and presentment. ❋ Unknown (2010)

This provides the bicameralism that some folks think is a necessary requirement for self-awareness and consciousness. ❋ Unknown (2009)

What would violate the bicameralism clause in ultimate execution is HR 3590 being public law, without reconciliation. ❋ Unknown (2010)

Under the position that the Slaughter Rule contains one bill, then the Senate would have to pass that exact bill because of the bicameralism requirement. ❋ Unknown (2010)

If he does both, signs the Senate bill, then signs a reconciliation bill, I for one do not see how the bicameralism clause is violated. ❋ Unknown (2010)

If the House does not pass exactly the same bill the Senate passed, then the bicameralism requirement is not met. ❋ Unknown (2010)

As for bicameralism, I am not arguing that point and would agree with you. ❋ Unknown (2010)