Biconditionals

Word BICONDITIONALS
Character 14
Hyphenation N/A
Pronunciations N/A

Definitions and meanings of "Biconditionals"

What do we mean by biconditionals?

Here you will find one or more explanations in English for the word biconditionals. Define biconditionals, biconditionals synonyms, biconditionals pronunciation, biconditionals translation, English dictionary definition of biconditionals.

Synonyms and Antonyms for Biconditionals

  • Synonyms for biconditionals
  • Biconditionals synonyms not found!!!
  • Antonyms for biconditionals
  • Biconditionals antonyms not found!

The word "biconditionals" in example sentences

Only if redundancy biconditionals are understood in this way does McGinn's argument go through. ❋ Young, James O. (2008)

In order to understand the response-dependent account of conceivability one has to take into consideration the nature and point of response-dependence biconditionals. the response-dependent biconditionals do not aim at a reductive analysis of conceivability and of the modal notions of possibility and necessity in terms of more basic concepts. ❋ Vaidya, Anand (2007)

In simple cases the above biconditionals will do as they are: for example, ❋ Nolan, Daniel (2007)

So the state of play seems to be this: while the Brock/Rosen style objection remains something for a modal fictionalist to be wary of when constructing the fiction of possible worlds, it is possible to avoid the objection by being suitably careful about what fictionalist biconditionals to employ: and if Noonan is right, strict adherence to the fictionalist modification of the equivalences offered by Lewis ❋ Nolan, Daniel (2007)

A modal fiction may require more contents than those yielded by such biconditionals: what other contents the fiction of possible worlds might contain is an important question, and one unsurprisingly which different modal fictionalists will answer differently. ❋ Nolan, Daniel (2007)

And a third view is that claims such as (3) and (4) assert a necessary equivalence between their right hand sides and their left hand sides; that is, both (3) and (4) are to be interpreted as material biconditionals that hold of necessity. ❋ Stoljar, Daniel (2007)

Instead of the simpler biconditionals discussed near the beginning of this entry and in Rosen 1990, the revised proposal is to take equivalences asserted by Lewis 1968 between modal claims and claims couched in terms of quantification over possible worlds, and treat those equivalences instead as specifying connections between modal statements and claims about what is true according to the fiction. ❋ Nolan, Daniel (2007)

He also defended the pursuit of biconditionals or even Schaffner identities, as factual relations, in terms its heuristic value (Wimsatt 1976). ❋ Cat, Jordi (2007)

Central to fictionalist treatments of possible worlds are biconditionals connecting truths about necessity and possibility, on the one hand, and the contents of the modal fiction, on the other. ❋ Nolan, Daniel (2007)

If the fictions disagreed sufficiently, there may even be fictions which meet the constraints but which differ on matters which are linked through the fictionalist's biconditionals with literal modal claims. ❋ Nolan, Daniel (2007)

One of the principal fictionalist biconditionals, as we have seen, is the biconditional connecting necessary truths and what the fiction asserts about all possible worlds: ❋ Nolan, Daniel (2007)

Central biconditionals will be all the instances of the following schemas (where P expresses a proposition): ❋ Nolan, Daniel (2007)

For purposes of everyday derivation he employed what can only be described as a system of natural deduction, making assumptions, following their consequences, collecting them and inferring conditionals and biconditionals, in the manner to which all students of logic have since become accustomed. ❋ Simons, Peter (2007)

Rosen states the form of the fictionalist biconditionals at its most general as: ❋ Nolan, Daniel (2007)

Recall that we want M² to satisfy the T-biconditionals: the most obvious thought here is to understand the ˜iff™ as the standard truth-conditional biconditional. ❋ Kremer, Philip (2006)

T, satisfy Tarski's T-biconditionals, i.e., the biconditionals of the form ❋ Kremer, Philip (2006)

Reasoning from h1 and these T-biconditionals, we conclude that ❋ Kremer, Philip (2006)

Tarski does not prove this cumbersome fact in a metametalanguage, and he helpfully contents himself with showing how a few of the biconditionals would be established in the metalanguage. ❋ Gómez-Torrente, Mario (2006)

Conditionals whose antecedents denote different structure types will typically have biconditionals as consequents whose mental term - constituents are co-referential but whose physical term - constituents denote different physical events. ❋ Bickle, John (2006)

In a semantics for languages capable of expressing their own truth concepts, T will not, in general, have a classical signification; and the ˜iff™ in the T-biconditionals will not be read as the classical biconditional. ❋ Kremer, Philip (2006)

Cross Reference for Biconditionals

  • Biconditionals cross reference not found!

What does biconditionals mean?

Best Free Book Reviews
Best IOS App Reviews
App Name Developer
Google Chrome App Reviews Google LLC
Gmail - Email by Google App Reviews Google LLC
Microsoft Teams App Reviews Microsoft Corporation
Facebook App Reviews Meta Platforms, Inc.
Cash App App Reviews Block, Inc.