Second, because no matter how much tests you have, cyclomatic complexity will always get you in the most inappropriate times. ❋ Unknown (2009)
The closest thing that I can think of that comes close to whatever “structural complexity of algorithms” means is cyclomatic complexity, which I never touched on. ❋ Unknown (2007)
If I add a decision, the cyclomatic complexity value goes up by 1: ❋ Zainnab (2011)
Notice the cyclomatic complexity is at 2 the lowest value possible. ❋ Zainnab (2011)
In this tip we will start out with a simple example of cyclomatic complexity to understand the concept quickly then give some additional information on actual usage and suggested limits. ❋ Zainnab (2011)
At a high level, we determine the value of cyclomatic complexity by counting the number of decisions made in our source code. ❋ Zainnab (2011)
As with many metrics in our industry, there is no exact cyclomatic complexity limit that fits all organizations. ❋ Zainnab (2011)
When working with code metrics, one of the least understood items seems to be cyclomatic complexity. ❋ Zainnab (2011)
This rule issues a warning when the cyclomatic complexity reaches 25 so it is a good thing to have to keep you from having excessive complexity. ❋ Zainnab (2011)
Essentially, with cyclomatic complexity, higher numbers are "bad" and lower numbers are "good". ❋ Zainnab (2011)
However, when we combine cyclomatic complexity with lines of code then we have a much clearer picture of the potential for errors. ❋ Zainnab (2011)
Given all the if statements, we can see why the cyclomatic complexity is at a 5. ❋ Zainnab (2011)
We use cyclomatic complexity to get a sense of how hard any given code may be to test, maintain, or troubleshoot as well as an indication of how likely the code will be to produce errors. ❋ Zainnab (2011)
I am not talking about abstract metrics like cyclomatic complexity, efferent coupling and etc. - those are useful but won't tell much without context. ❋ Unknown (2010)
Try measuring cyclomatic complexity and applying it to security testing/inspection. ❋ Andre Gironda Andreg@xxxxxxxxx (2010)
They include cyclomatic complexity calculations for pinpointing problematic code and the ability to profile Windows Communication Foundation-based apps. ❋ Unknown (2010)
I show how to produce projected graphs from dependencies, heat-maps for cyclomatic complexity and code coverage, using XSLT to extract visual information from XML configuration documents, and others. ❋ Unknown (2010)
Checks cyclomatic complexity against a specified limit. ❋ Matthijs Galesloot (2010)
