This is what they called impanation, invination, consubstantiation. ❋ David Marshall Brooks (N/A)
Christ's Real Presence by a kind of impanation (Christum quodammodo impanari). ❋ 1840-1916 (1913)
March, 1538, to the pastor Vitus Theodorus in Nuremberg, merely expresses his suspicion that Osiander held the doctrine of impanation. ❋ 1840-1916 (1913)
The doctrine of impanation agrees with the doctrine of consubstantiation, as it was taught by Luther, in these two essential points: it denies on the one hand the Transubstantiation of bread and wine into the Body and Blood of Christ, and on the other professes nevertheless the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist. ❋ 1840-1916 (1913)
Andreas Osiander (died 1552), a fervent disciple of Luther, seems to have held the doctrine of impanation, though later Lutheran theologians have tried to acquit him of this error. ❋ 1840-1916 (1913)
The doctrine of impanation as far as it denies the ❋ 1840-1916 (1913)
Alger of Liège cited Rupert as an advocate of impanation, since it remains unknown whether Rupert had already published his ambiguous expression at the time when Alger wrote his attack. ❋ 1840-1916 (1913)
Bayma, a Catholic theologian, in a series of theses proposed a theory on Transubstantiation, which, upon critical examination, comes very close to the above mentioned teaching of William of Paris; in fact, it seems to explain the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist by impanation. ❋ 1840-1916 (1913)
The theologians of the Reformed Churches, calling this doctrine, in their attack against the Lutherans, impanation, use the term not in the strict sense explained above, but in a wider meaning. ❋ 1840-1916 (1913)
On the other hand Innocent VII directed the archbishop (24 June, 1405) to take measures against the heretical teachings of Wyclif, especially the doctrine of impanation in the ❋ 1840-1916 (1913)
This teaching, however rightly or wrongly attributed to Berengarius, evidently does not profess impanation in the strict sense of the term; it rather coincides with the above-mentioned doctrine of consubstantiation as taught by Luther. ❋ 1840-1916 (1913)
With much better reason, John of Paris (died 1306) is considered the champion of the strict doctrine of impanation. ❋ 1840-1916 (1913)
He affirms with special emphasis his faith in the mystery of the Holy Trinity, and in the real presence of Our Saviour in the Holy Eucharist -- a protestation against the two heresies which had troubled that century, the tritheism of Roscelin, and the impanation of ❋ 1840-1916 (1913)
This genuinely Lutheran doctrine it was that also David Henkel had been preaching, and which his opponents who charged him with Roman aberrations called transubstantiation, impanation, or consubstantiation. ❋ Unknown (1894)
Christ, though real, is neither an impanation nor a companation, neither ❋ Unknown (1894)
(communicatio idiomatum), in the very same way, in consequence of the impanation — a word coined in imitation of incarnation — an interchange of predicates takes place between the Son of God and the substance of bread, though only through the mediation of the body of ❋ 1840-1916 (1913)
The word consubstantiation, however, is not found in the Lutheran symbols, and is rejected by Lutheran theologians if used in the sense of impanation. " ❋ Unknown (1894)
Schaff wrote in his _Creeds of Christendom_: "The Lutheran Church, as represented in Luther's writings and in the Form of Concord, rejects transubstantiation, and also the doctrine of impanation, _i.e. _, a local inclusion of Christ's body and blood in the elements (_localis inclusio in pane_), or a permanent and extrasacramental conjunction of the two substances (_durabilis aliqua conjunctio extra usum sacramenti_); ❋ Unknown (1894)
