A karmic tendency is imputably knowable by depending on its basis for labeling. ❋ Unknown (2009)
Thus, to cognize the “not-yet-happening of the result,” we must rely on actual simultaneous cognition of the presently-happening mental continuum on which is imputable the karmic tendency for the result that has, imputably knowable on it, a “facet of temporarily not giving rise to its result.” ❋ Unknown (2009)
That absence is a static nonimplicative negation phenomenon, also imputably knowable on the basis of the mental continuum. ❋ Unknown (2009)
Gelug Prasangika accepts the distinction, made by the other Indian Buddhist tenet systems, between some phenomena being self-sufficiently knowable and some being only imputably knowable, but asserts the manner in which they make this distinction as referring merely to the coarse level of these two sets of phenomena. ❋ Unknown (2009)
Moreover, it too is a noncongruent affecting variable, imputably knowable on the basis of a mental continuum. ❋ Unknown (2009)
Gelug Prasangika identifies the basis for labeling a karmic tendency specifically as the mere “me” (nga-tsam), which itself is also a noncongruent affecting variable, imputably knowable on the basis of a mental continuum. ❋ Unknown (2009)
Like the “not-yet-happening of the result,” the “temporarily not-giving-rise to its result” is a nonstatic implicative negation phenomena and a noncongruent affecting variable, imputably knowable on the basis of a karmic tendency. ❋ Unknown (2009)
Except for yogic cognition and nonconceptual clear light cognition, all other cognitions, both conceptual and nonconceptual, give rise to mental aspects representing true existence imputably knowable on the basis of all other mental aspects that it makes appear. ❋ Unknown (2006)
A space is a valid, imputably knowable object imputed or imputable by conceptual cognition on either an object that is already located somewhere, or on an empty in-between area (bar-snang) – an area between two material objects that does not have any material object located in it. ❋ Unknown (2006)
It concerns whether the validly knowable “me” is self-sufficiently knowable or imputably knowable (btags-yod). ❋ Unknown (2006)
True stoppings, after all, are imputably knowable and therefore valid cognition of them requires reliance on another object. ❋ Unknown (2006)
Here, both truths are imputedly knowable, and they may be imputably knowable with either of two states of mind: total absorption (mnyam-bzhag, meditative equipoise) or subsequent attainment (rjes-thob, subsequent realization, post-meditation). ❋ Unknown (2006)
Prasangika also accepts the common division scheme between self-sufficiently and imputedly knowable phenomena, but considers imputably knowable, in this shared sense, as coarse imputedly knowable. ❋ Unknown (2006)
Prasangika accepts the common division scheme between self-sufficiently and imputedly knowable phenomena as asserted by Chittamatra, but considers imputably knowable, in this shared sense held in common with Chittamatra, as coarse imputedly knowable. ❋ Unknown (2006)
From the subtler point of view, however, all phenomena are imputably knowable, dependently arising from reliance on a basis for imputation. ❋ Unknown (2006)
Simultaneously with that explicit apprehension, we distortedly cognize a mental aspect representing true existence imputably knowable on the basis of the hand. ❋ Unknown (2006)
Then, we explicitly apprehend both a body and a person imputably knowable on the basis of the body. ❋ Unknown (2006)
In other words, it still feels as though there is some findable characteristic feature on the side of such an imputably knowable “me” that, by its own power, makes this person truly and uniquely “me” and not someone else. ❋ Unknown (2002)
The revolution performed by Strether under the influence of the most interesting of great cities was to have nothing to do with any betise of the imputably “tempted” state; he was to be thrown forward, rather, thrown quite with violence, upon his lifelong trick of intense reflexion: which friendly test indeed was to bring him out, through winding passages, through alternations of darkness and light, very much IN Paris, but with the surrounding scene itself a minor matter, a mere symbol for more things than had been dreamt of in the philosophy of Woollett. ❋ Unknown (2003)
The revolution performed by Strether under the influence of the most interesting of great cities was to have nothing to do with any betise of the imputably "tempted" state; he was to be thrown forward, rather, thrown quite with violence, upon his lifelong trick of intense reflexion: which friendly test indeed was to bring him out, through winding passages, through alternations of darkness and light, very much IN Paris, but with the surrounding scene itself a minor matter, a mere symbol for more things than had been dreamt of in the philosophy of Woollett. ❋ Henry James (1879)
