Kantian

It seems like his claim that (paraphrasing) “persons possess moral status, rather than just bearing moral weight.” is just a kantian “people are never means, always ends” gussied up a bit. ❋ Unknown (2008)

Heidegger now, obviously, has to answer the question whether Christianity is opposed to neo-kantian idealism. ❋ Enowning (2008)

This is not the post-kantian subject explored by such philosophers as Karl Jaspers and Paul Ricoeur, that is, the study of the categories shown in the activities of the religious consciousness. ❋ Cameron, J.M. (1982)

A word or two may be added upon a point which owing to the prevalence of kantian ideas is of actual importance. ❋ 1840-1916 (1913)

This being our post-humian and post-kantian state of mind, I will ask your permission to leave the soul wholly out of the present discussion and to consider only the residual dilemma. ❋ William James (1876)

Any other picture than this of post-kantian absolutism I am unable to frame. ❋ William James (1876)

But if the belief in the soul ever does come to life after the many funeral-discourses which humian and kantian criticism have preached over it, I am sure it will be only when some one has found in the term a pragmatic significance that has hitherto eluded observation. ❋ William James (1876)

If all change went thus drop-wise, so to speak, if real time sprouted or grew by units of duration of determinate amount, just as our perceptions of it grow by pulses, there would be no zenonian paradoxes or kantian antinomies to trouble us. ❋ William James (1876)

"zone_info": "huffpost. premium/blog; nickname = coleen-rowley; entry_id = 102161; darius-rejali = 1; john-mccain = 1; kantian = 1; rev-desmond-tutu = 1; tao-rodriguez-seeger = 1; torture-and-democracy = 1; utilitarian = 1", ❋ Unknown (2008)

HPConfig. blog_id = 0; var ads_page_type = 'bpage'; var zone_info = "huffpost. premium/blog; nickname = coleen-rowley; entry_id = 102161; darius-rejali = 1; john-mccain = 1; kantian = 1; rev-desmond-tutu = 1; tao-rodriguez-seeger = 1; torture-and-democracy = 1; utilitarian = 1"; if (top! ❋ Unknown (2008)

That Kantian [lad] has [a perfect] 100 in this class quick sit next to him so we can [cheat]. ❋ Yay-erz (2018)

Kantian idealism predicts that [religion] will [absorb] [science] to create science-religion. ❋ Metawave (2019)

Kantianism [argues] that [free will] exists because the [uncountable] set of points in the Tarski-interior count themselves. The countable set of points in a non-Tarski plane is provided by the sense-path (polynominalism). The uncountable set of points in a non-Tarski space is provided by sublumination from The Maya: this is the information from the present moment. The uncountable set is able to count itself because of meta-nominalism the ability of numbers to count themselves or--more-locally-to-the-mind--precession--the [1:1] relationship between the interior-points of the non-Tarski space and the Fauvic spaces. ❋ Flightfacilities (2022)

[Kantianism] is a theory of free will in-the-mind. It relies on an external device called 'aesthetic process judgement' or The [Limina], called "forma-spinning." It argues that; in the mind; sense triumphs over the present moment. This is because consideration is always counting; but counting is not always consideration. The [Kantian dialectic] relies on an external device Kant called the 'thing-in-itself' or "free-will-in-itself." ❋ Flightfacilities (2022)

[Kantian interpolation] is a dialectic in which the senses win out via [supersymmetry] over the uncountable information provided by the present moment. Put another way; the Kantian interpolation is an alternation between consideration & counting. Kantian interpolation tells us that the mind is a battlefield between the present moment which provides an uncountable number of Tarski-points from the Maya and the senses which provide an infinite number of points to the non-Tarski space. (The infinite set of points comes to non-Tarski space from supersymmetry via polynominalism.) The [Kantian] approach hints that the infinite set of points win out in the human mind over the uncountable set of points through the process-of-aesthetic-judgment forma-spinning. Thus: consideration wins out in the human mind; because counting is not alway consideration but consideration is always counting. Ie. the subconscious does not need the mind to count... ❋ Flightfacilities (2022)