Obreption

In its effects subreption is equivalent to obreption (q.v.), which consists in a positive allegation of what is false. ❋ 1840-1916 (1913)

Moreover, these dispensations are supposed to be given motu proprio and with certain knowledge, from which it follows that they are not vitiated by obreption or by subreption. ❋ 1840-1916 (1913)

When a supplica is affected (in a material point) by obreption or subreption it becomes necessary to ask for a so-called ❋ 1840-1916 (1913)

For this, and in general for the information which should accompany the petition, in order that a dispensation be valid, see below apropos of obreption and subreption in rescripts of dispensation. ❋ 1840-1916 (1913)

Rescripts obtained by obreption or subreption are null and void when the motive cause of the rescript is affected by them. ❋ 1840-1916 (1913)

When the petition contains a statement about facts or circumstances that are supposititious or at least, modified if they really exist, the resulting rescript is said to be vitiated by obreption. ❋ 1840-1916 (1913)

+ (a) when the dispensation is composed of several distinct and separable parts, that part or element alone is nullified on which falls the obreption or subreption, as the case may be; ❋ 1840-1916 (1913)

+ (b) when several adequately distinguished motive causes are set forth, the dispensation is null and void only when the obreption or subreption in question affects them all. ❋ 1840-1916 (1913)

From the respective nature of each of these forms of dispensation result certain important consequences that affect delegation, obreption, and revocation in the matter of dispensations (see DELEGATION; OBREPTION; ❋ 1840-1916 (1913)