I agree with #3 – this rivals in obviousness the idea of using 1-click to buy something online, which resulted in interminable squabbling and litigation about who thought of such an obvious thing first. — ❋ Unknown (2008)
The issue of obviousness is somewhat of a red herring. ❋ Unknown (2007)
His penchant for exploitive obviousness is in full tow. ❋ Unknown (2007)
My tolerance for such obviousness is low right now. ❋ Unknown (2005)
The claim has a certain surface plausibility, but it’s usually awfully hard to keep a straight face when contemplating particular examples, and the grounds for insisting that your retrospective intuition of obviousness is mistaken almost always amounts to pointing out that the first guy to file the patent was — they’ll keep saying it until you grasp this thorny concept — the first guy to file the patent. ❋ Unknown (2009)
But pre-KSR precedent refutes Plaintiffs' theory of non-obviousness, which is that the costs of the coating process would have dissuaded a skilled formulator from combining the references. ❋ Peter Zura (2007)
Perhaps instead of discussing which is the "more obvious" interpretation, which ultimately doesn't prove anything since "obviousness" is a matter of perception, we should be focusing on the relevant contextual and comparative information. ❋ James F. McGrath (2009)
Since business method patents like that have had a very poor success rate in the wild, and the recent Supreme Court ruling has made "obviousness" mean "obviousness" again, if he tries to enforce it, he'll get smacked in the face with the rolled-up newspaper of reality. ❋ Unknown (2007)
It cannot be stressed strongly enough that "obviousness" is a legal concept that is completely independent of "patentable subject matter." ❋ Peter Zura (2006)
… This is the kind of obviousness that a child can see. ❋ David Gelernter (1994)
Instead, we experience them with with a sense of compelling urgency, a kind of obviousness, even in the midst of all that remains inscrutable. ❋ Unknown (1999)
He had, in fact, to contend against their preconceived ideas and their lack of appreciation of the significance of the progress he had made before he could persuade them of its "obviousness". ❋ G. Elliot Smith (N/A)
No, the Supreme Court ruling in question should be from the the KSR case, which helped set a higher "obviousness" bar to clear. ❋ Unknown (2010)
In a one dimensional movie this kind of narration would be one dimensional and obvious yes, but in this complex, layered plot the 'obviousness' of the matter of fact narration had the opposite and comic effect, it was obviously not trying to explain the plot, it reminded me of the narration of another movie I saw for the first time a few months ago - Barry Lyndon - ❋ Unknown (2009)
In such a scenario, we wouldn't even be debating the "obviousness" of Rice and Dawson (who would potentionally have been first-balloters), and may even be in strong support of Mattingly or Murphy. ❋ Unknown (2009)
A quick glance suggests not only prior art on all of them (a method for creating a pay-for-service website? filed in 2004? seriously?), but that none of these should have passed the "obviousness" test. ❋ Unknown (2009)
But [obviously] there's no [truth] to it, [i mean] [OBVIOUSLY] ❋ Now Kiss Me You Fool (2019)
[ObViOuSlY] we [aren]’t [in a relationship] ❋ Larrysrealgurl (2020)
its [obviously not] [true] ❋ (2020)
someone denying something: no
louis: i-ah-ive never really been asked about it directly um
it's a funny thing, i mean look people can, [ehh], people can believe what the wanna believe but i just think it comes across sometimes a little bit.. um, a little bit disrespectful to the ones that i love, you know like [eleanor]...um... sometimes it comes across as a bit disrespectful...um, and it's like anything, i mean, like you can genuinely...if you google [conspiracy] on iphones, right, your gonna get a conspiracy, so i think it's just one of these things that people just love to buy into but in realit- in reality obviously there's no truth to it.
ObViOuSlY ❋ Colorpopz (2022)
I'm [just awesome]... obviously ❋ Asexual (2004)
[Louis]: Obviously there is [no proof] to it
[Larries]: You sure? ❋ Bestgaylouisstan (2021)
He's never [actually] been [asked] [about it] oBvIoUsLy ❋ (2022)
obviousism is when you’re [looking in] your [pantry] or refrigerator for a particular food item and can't find it, then [some else] comes over and points to it and it was really -- right in front of you because just experienced an obviousism. ❋ Word Amplifier (2009)
[obviously] there’s no [truth] to it [oBvIoUsLy] ❋ DAYTONABABY (2021)
1. Shane: “So I was in the darkroom all alone, right? And obviously, my daughter having secretly swapped the chemicals for some other ones, the fumes obviously sent me to sleep. Obviously, I didn’t wake up until the [meteorite] burst through the ceiling.”
Cedric: “Obvious to whom? You are an oaf, Shane.”
2. “Well, Gary … we’re going to go out there and play some football today and, er, hopefully, [come away with] a result …obviously… cuz… well, that’s what football’s about, at the end of the day – obviously – the results speak for themselves and basically, it’s all about the [silverware] on the [sideboard] at the end of the season so we’re going to try to score some goals and …obviously…”
3. “[Dicky] was coming on to Harriet so obviously that we all covered our faces and groaned with embarrassment.”
4. “It was at that point, officer that he stabbed me. Sorry about the blood all over your shoes. My shirt is ruined, obviously. Do you think I could claim for that on my insurance?” ❋ John McCririck's Unlucky Laundress (2006)
