Payor

But then again doesn't everyone have pad costs unless the tax payor is footing the bill?? ❋ Unknown (2008)

So until Obama's administration buys every company doing business in the United States and your paycheck says that the payor is the US Government, then you can call it Socialism which he can't do without the Congress and Senate passing the bill. ❋ Unknown (2009)

Specifically, FPHCI does not include dividends received by a CFC from a payor corporation that satisfies all of the following three requirements: • The payor is a corporation that is a related person to the CFC; • The payor is created or organized under the laws of the same foreign country as the CFC; and• A substantial part of the payor's assets is used in a trade or business located in the payor's country of incorporation (which also is the CFC's country of incorporation). ❋ Umling (2010)

There needs to be a single payor system, not just a public option. thomas lybbert ❋ Unknown (2009)

He relates to the payor spouse, the person making payments, and the payee, the spouse who is being paid, in ways that don't come easily to most. ❋ Marah Nudel (2011)

April 16, 2010, 11: 38 am morganovich: my personal favorite are the people who rail at health insurance companies for abusing their “monopoly power” and want “single payor” instead. ❋ Unknown (2010)

(And single payor has never, ever been on the table anyway.) ❋ Unknown (2009)

Health care (and insurance) costs have been rising for two primary reasons – the tax exempt status of employer provided health benefits that encourages third-party payor systems which feed the tragedy of the commons dilemma, combined with the aging population that (given the foregoing externality) has little monetary incentive to individually curb health care consumption because the costs of the individual health care decisions are spread out among many similatly-situated persons. ❋ Unknown (2010)

And truthfully, without a single payor approach (which to all of you nay-sayers scared to death of the "S" word is the best way to negotiate for the patient because their would be a monopoly for the consumer) a public plan shouldn't be anything more than a safety net. ❋ Unknown (2009)

He is clearly on record with his supporters pledging his complete support a single payor system, and now that he is trying to sell this package to the public he says that this is not the case! ❋ Unknown (2009)

Dec. 2007: New Hampshire Medical Society, Survey of New Hampshire Physicians – Two thirds of New Hampshire physicians, including 81% of primary care clinicians, indicated they would favor a simplified payor system in which public funds, collected through taxes, were used to pay directly for services to meet the basic healthcare needs of all citizens. ❋ Unknown (2009)

When he says there should be a single-payor plan for "all Americans" is he including himself, the rest of congress and the President and all of their families? ❋ Unknown (2009)

But insurers would not go out of business and there would be no sudden conversion to single payor because most people get (and would continue to get) their health insurance through work. ❋ Unknown (2010)

Going to a single payor system would increase the competitiveness of US businesses significantly. ❋ Unknown (2009)

We have higher mortality rates for infants, the poor and people of color and lower life expectancy rates than single payor countries with socialized health care. ❋ Unknown (2009)

Why don't people realize that a single payor system, which would remove the burden of paying for healthcare from the employers, is actually the most pro-business and pro-employment option there is? ❋ Unknown (2009)

Apparently those are the same people as single payor advocates. ❋ Unknown (2010)

“Until the payor community” — that is, companies that provide health insurance — “develops the appetite to be more aggressive, it would be irresponsible for us to press them on it,” he added. ❋ Unknown (2009)