I watched planets how they move on their orbits and I started to shift Nibirus period, parameters so, that it-Nibiru entered among outdoor planets approx. 20 years ago,…20 years before 2012, such way that Nibiru should be in perihelia 6.6. 2012 in time of Venus transit. ❋ Unknown (2009)
All planetoids behind Pluto, Pluto, Neptune are close to perihelia or aphelia on their orbits. ❋ Unknown (2009)
Nibiru, should be somewhere 1,5billion km from us because it's proximity to perihelia, circa as far as Saturn. ❋ Unknown (2009)
Results are two hot spots next to Orion what are projections of coming Nibiru during spring and autumn equinoxes, represent also distance of Nibiru from us circa 1,5 billions km,…like Saturn from us,..so it means arrival of Nibiru to perihelia in 3 years, in 2012! ❋ Unknown (2009)
As it looks now, you would think there are two perihelia and two aphelia... ❋ EliRabett (2009)
The sun on the center of your screen, on the very left edge of your screen, that's what we like to call a sun dog or a perihelia. ❋ Unknown (2008)
“Those minor planets all are known to rotate in a narrow zone between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter; in their perihelia they cannot approximate the sun as we have done; we shall not be classed with them.” ❋ Unknown (2003)
Ordinarily, comets are conspicuous at their perihelia, as being their shortest distances from the sun, which is the focus of their orbit, and inasmuch as a parabola is but an ellipse with its axis indefinitely produced, for some short portion of its pathway the orbit may be indifferently considered either one or the other; but in this particular case the professor was right in adopting the supposition of its being parabolic. ❋ Unknown (2003)
Considered from a scientific point of view, some of the gravest errors into which the author has fallen are the suppositions, that the perihelia and nodes of the planetary orbits move uniformly, and that they can ever become exactly circular. ❋ Various (N/A)
The art has also been applied to the observation of comets at distances from their perihelia so great as to prevent their visual observation. ❋ George Forbes (1892)
"Those minor planets all are known to rotate in a narrow zone between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter; in their perihelia they cannot approximate the sun as we have done; we shall not be classed with them." ❋ Unknown (1877)
Those -- and they are many -- who vaguely think that science is something different from common-sense, and that any book is scientific which talks about perihelia and asymptotes and cetacea, will find their vague notions here well corroborated. ❋ Unknown (1876)
Crossing as they often do the paths of the planets in their progress to and from their perihelia, it cannot but be that they should now and then come in contact with one of these spheres. ❋ Various (1841)
If we assume an equable distribution of their orbits, and the limits of their perihelia, or greatest proximities to the Sun, and the possibility of their remaining invisible to the inhabitants of the Earth, and base our estimates on the rules of the calculus of probabilities, we shall obtain as the result an amount of myriads perfectly astonishing. ❋ Alexander Von Humboldt (1814)
This comet, therefore, which, according to Goldschmidt, passes beyond the orbit of Jupiter, is one of the few whose perihelia are beyond ❋ Alexander Von Humboldt (1814)
The observed perihelia, varying from 1 to 3 AU, are incompatible with any origin of comets beyond 3 au. ❋ Unknown (2009)