Charlie, you totally reject the idea of phylogenesis, am I correct? ❋ Unknown (2005)
The third version, unlike the more idealistic first and second vesions, intoroduces terms such as the unconscious, inhibition, and crisis, contains a crucial section on mesmerism, and is structured around the trauma of onto - and phylogenesis. ❋ Unknown (2008)
Much like in E. Haeckel's quip 'Ontogenesis recapitulates phylogenesis'. ❋ Unknown (2009)
Best to leave that fancy stuff for later, and concentrate on more basic phylogenesis: it would be nice, for example, to be a vertebrate again. ❋ Ann Althouse (2008)
I was excited to meet him because I had read his dissertation on the phylogenesis of modern Megalonychidae, and I wanted to quiz him on certain . . . aspects of his research that I saw as questionable. ❋ Unknown (2008)
One might expect that since current orthodoxy maintains that biological processes of ontogenesis proceed differently from the selectionist processes of phylogenesis, evolutionary epistemologies would reflect this difference. ❋ Bradie, Michael (2008)
Nothing in evolution makes sense except in the light of phylogenesis, like ontogenesis, being a front-loaded, self-limiting, self-terminating planned process where the environment plays little if any role outside of providing triggers to proceed to the next stage of diversification. ❋ Unknown (2006)
The phylogenesis of the human species covers a process of evolution in which the organs that produce and identify sounds and the brain which makes sense of those sounds develop over a long period of time which includes the birth of Mankind. ❋ Unknown (1989)
Already in this first of his generalizations Haeckel implied through the use of the verb bedingen a causal rela - tionship between ontogenesis and phylogenesis. ❋ JANE OPPENHEIMER (1968)
Therefore, the supposition is justified that ontogenesis corresponds in psychology to phylogenesis. ❋ JANE OPPENHEIMER (1968)
Ontogenesis is the short and rapid recapitulation of phylogenesis, caused by the physiological functions of inheritance ❋ JANE OPPENHEIMER (1968)
The alleged biological truth that the individual in his growth from the simple embryo to maturity repeats the history of the evolution of animal life in the progress of forms from the simplest to the most complex (or expressed technically, that ontogenesis parallels phylogenesis) does not concern us, save as it is supposed to afford scientific foundation for cultural recapitulation of the past. ❋ Unknown (1916)
It summarises the history of species; ontogenesis, we are told, reproduces phylogenesis. ❋ Edouard Louis Emmanuel Julien Le Roy (1912)
We have concentrated the full force of our discussion upon an example drawn from phylogenesis. ❋ Henri Bergson (1900)
Ontogenesis may be considered as a repetition of phylogenesis insofar as the latter has not been varied by a more recent experience. ❋ Sigmund Freud (1897)
A similar connection determines the relation between ontogenesis and phylogenesis. ❋ Sigmund Freud (1897)
I used this example in order to show how unnecessary it is to assume a special internal evolutionary power for the phylogenesis of species, for this whole order of whales is, so to speak, _made up of adaptations_; it deviates in many essential respects from the usual mammalian type, and all the deviations are adaptations to aquatic life. ❋ Gustav Schwalbe (1880)
For this purpose we can borrow facts from two distinct sources: (a) individual development, which is the safest, clearest, and easiest to observe; (b) the development of the species, or historical development, according to the accepted principle that phylogenesis and ontogenesis follow the same general line. ❋ Albert Heyem Nachmen Baron (1877)
