Plurally

I want to be plurally married to Margine and Chloe Sevigny! ❋ Unknown (2008)

In response, he made himself a diffuse, uncertain thing, a mass of contradictory, irresolvable voices that speak truth plurally. ❋ Smith, Zadie (2009)

Here F is not a placeholder in a schema, but a genuine variable ranging over properties or classes (or, on some interpretations, ranging plurally over individuals). ❋ Corcoran, John (2008)

Polygamy is still marriage, albiet plurally, and some people are willing to enter into these types of arrangements (unfortunately my wife will have none of it). ❋ Unknown (2008)

The latter had only one side, and therefore — plurally and pedantically speaking — NO SIDES. ❋ Unknown (2006)

Representative Castle was circulating talking points about a measure that the House ended up killing that would have provided for research into promising areas that would give us access to what he wants, which are plurally potent cells. ❋ Unknown (2006)

"Archives" is originally and most standardly only feminine plural in French source: Petit Robert, and the equivalent typically occurs plurally in Latin, it seems. ❋ Unknown (2005)

What is the dictum on teams that do not end plurally? ❋ William Safire (2003)

"I really wish you would not speak plurally of them, Ann," cried Ruth, laughing. ❋ Alice B. Emerson (N/A)

He speaks singularly, he that ruleth, as of one kind of ruling officer; not plurally, they that rule, as if he had indefinitely or universally meant all the ruling officers in the church. ❋ Unknown (N/A)

We can pluralize it: inikw-ihl-’minih; it is still either “fires in the house” or “burn plurally in the house. ❋ Unknown (1921)

It needs no labored argument to prove that the concept of plurality is here hardly less concrete than that of location “in the east, ” and that the Yana form corresponds in feeling not so much to our “They burn in the east” (ardunt oriente) as to a “Burn-several-east-s, it plurally burns in the east, ” an expression which we cannot adequately assimilate for lack of the necessary form-grooves into which to run it. ❋ Unknown (1921)

” We can diminutivize this plural: inikw-ihl-’minih-’is, “little fires in the house” or “burn plurally and slightly in the house. ❋ Unknown (1921)

"I don't give them plurally," said Patty, smiling at him. ❋ Carolyn Wells (1902)

The latter had only one side, and therefore -- plurally and pedantically speaking -- NO SIDES. ❋ Edwin Abbott Abbott (1882)

Perhaps it would not have been decorous; they do not let ladies, either singly or plurally, into the garden of the convent, which is memorable among many other facts as being the retreat of Mr. Commodus when he suffered from sleeplessness, and where he once carelessly left his list of victims lying about, so that his friend Marcia found it and, reading her name in it, joined with other friends in his assassination. ❋ William Dean Howells (1878)

[Stay] [plural] [my friends]. ❋ Lay Z Lost Boi (2014)

"This is my friend, they're [plural] so sometimes they will [switch] to [someone else]!" ❋ Slaughterofangels (2022)

[How are you going] to fit all [seven] friends in that little car?" "Oh, they're a plural and only take [up one] seat! ❋ The JC Klatch (2010)

1: The plural of cat is cats. Duck is ducks. Book is books. 2: "Apple's and [orange's] [on sale]" is incorrect. "[Apples and oranges] on sale", however, is. ❋ Major Sterrance (2007)

There are [several] online communities [run by] [plurals]. ❋ Jay Young (2005)

there are 0 cats in the room. there are 3 cats in the room. The phrase "there is 1 cat in the room" is an example of [plural's] counterpart, [singular]. Two [halves] are better than one, even though two halves is equal to one. While one half is singular, two halves is plural. And we wouldn't say "two halves are plural". Yet, two halves are one, is fine. ❋ Phlexicon (2007)

Plurals ❋ Hiscaucasianqueen (2010)

[The way] you talk to [authority] [figures] is so plural dude. ❋ Brandonious (2005)

That [concert] was [plural]! ❋ GingerKarisma (2009)

Kid 1: hey look its a plurality of [cool kids] Kid 2: no, that is an [incorrect] [usage]. ❋ Thek1ll3rofwords (2011)