Radiometric

Truth is, there are wide margins of error in radiometric dating that fairly demand results be taken with a large grain of salt. ❋ Unknown (2007)

Topics include: new developments in radiometric dating and the geologic time scale; timing of the onset of plate tectonics on Earth; a possible tool for identifying orbitally-driven changes in sea level; discovery of a new type of fossilized hot spring; macrobenthic response to the K-P boundary event; new insights into tectonics on Mars; and formation of ultradeep diamonds in former oceanic crust. ❋ Unknown (2005)

The method of using radioactive decay to measure absolute age is called radiometric dating ❋ Rcooperfreeport (2010)

Phil, it's fine if you want to take the approach of rates varying over time, but then apply that approach consistently to other observed rates, such as radiometric dating. ❋ Sunda62 (2010)

In favor of long periods of time: a "day" CAN mean an indefinite period of time, and does mean this in some places in scripture; there is a lot of activity on day six (animals and Adam created, Adam lonely, Eve created, animals named); some scientific evidence seems to indicate the earth is old (such as radiometric dating of some rocks). ❋ Mahipal33 (2009)

They reject the methods of science (e.g. radiometric dating for evolution; computer modeling for global warming). ❋ Unknown (2009)

And this was before the advent of radiometric dating. ❋ Unknown (2010)

It's not just sending commands and receiving data, but also orbit determination, or keeping track of where the spacecraft are with radiometric tracking data so that spacecraft navigators can get probes exactly where the scientists want them to go. ❋ Unknown (2010)

The Institute for Creation Research has a project called RATE, whose intent was to overturn radiometric absolute dating methods as evidence for an old age of the earth. ❋ Unknown (2010)

It does not impact the techniques of radiometric dating. ❋ Unknown (2010)

For the Earth swingbys where the anomaly has been detected, Morley said the main manifestation has been "the inability to get anything like a reasonable fit of an orbit to an arc of radiometric data that encompasses both the pre- and post-perigee closest to the Earth intervals." ❋ Unknown (2009)

But after analyzing the radiometric data gathered by ESA and NASA ground stations, nothing anomalous was seen. ❋ Unknown (2009)

Evolutionist detractors, however, pointed to him quoting Woodmorappe, John; "Radiometric Geochronology Reappraised," Woodmorappe being a Creationist and therefore, by Evolutionist definition, wrong, rendering Corliss himself consequently wrong and the big tent of evolution, especially the aspect of radiometric dating, safe once again. ❋ Unknown (2009)

William R. Corliss, in Science Frontiers #10, Spring 1980, supported the notion that on the subject of anomalous radiometric dates, 'over 300 serious discrepancies are tabulated and backed by some 445 references from the scientific literature.' ❋ Unknown (2009)

The predictability of the rate of decay is the key to all radiometric clocks. ❋ RICHARD DAWKINS (2009)

So, Zinj was the earliest but I think one of the most important things that the work at Olduvai provided, and it didn't provide it in '59 but a year later, was its context involved the possibility of dating through potassium-argon and later argon-argon radiometric dating and for the first time the very considerable antiquity of early hominids was established. ❋ Unknown (2009)

Their catch-all alibi is "radiometric dating can't be trusted". ❋ Unknown (2009)

Person 1: Cool [fossil]! How old is it? Person 2: [I'm not sure]. But we can [find out] from radiometric dating! ❋ HughMann45 (2023)