FEC case for reargument is potentially the more interesting decision. ❋ Unknown (2009)
Federal Election Commission for reargument in September — before the next term of the Court begins. ❋ Unknown (2009)
The Court stunned most observers back in June, when it asked for reargument in what seemed a small and narrow case: Citizens United v. the Federal Election Commission. ❋ Unknown (2009)
Will Justice Souter be on the Court for the Citizens United reargument? ❋ Unknown (2009)
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard a historic reargument in the case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, and the Justices have a chance to revisit two of their greatest offenses against the Constitution. ❋ Unknown (2009)
But in asking for reargument in that case, the Court invited the publisher of the movie to make the case that Congress did not have the authority to limit corporate political expenditure, even though as far back as 1902, and as recently as 2006, the Court had upheld that authority. ❋ Unknown (2009)
Today, the Court failed to reach a decision in Citizens United v. FEC, and set the case for reargument in September. ❋ Unknown (2009)
Instead, the court declined to rule, opting to interrupt its summer vacation for a special reargument on the broader question of whether to overrule the 1990 decision in the Michigan campaign case. ❋ Unknown (2009)
If three justices do not concur in a decision, a reargument must be ordered. ❋ Unknown (2007)
A motion was filed today for a reargument based on the conflicting decision concerning the finding of "blight" made Dec. 3 in the Appellate Division in the Columbia University eminent domain case, a veritable twin to the Atlantic Yards case. ❋ Unknown (2009)
The Court's last act of the past term was to schedule reargument in Citizens United v. FEC, a case that questioned whether a 90-minute film slamming Hillary Clinton was subject to federal campaign finance disclosure and disclaimer requirements. ❋ Unknown (2009)
The court could limit reargument to briefs on the significance of the UCMJ provision. ❋ Ann Althouse (2008)
Based on the Mr Chabasinski's letter to the court, a hearing for reargument on the extension and modification of the December 29, 2006, temporary injunction has now been scheduled for January 8, 2007, at 2: 00 pm. ❋ Unknown (2007)
Mr. Trump has sought reargument and renewal on, and filed a notice of appeal in connection with, his dismissed claims. ❋ Unknown (2007)
Even more interesting than the letter Prof. Tushnet describes, I wish the Court had ordered reargument. ❋ Unknown (2004)
Did the Court even considered reargument, or was that simply a can of worms the Court just didn't want to open? ❋ Unknown (2004)
