Sequitur

The non sequitur is yours I'm afraid: There is nothing about voice recognition that requires processing anything but the "physicality" of soundwaves. ❋ Unknown (2008)

Aiguy: The non sequitur is yours I'm afraid: There is nothing about voice recognition that requires processing anything but the "physicality" of soundwaves. ❋ Unknown (2008)

Another non-sequitur is a proposal to train teachers to "make lessons more relevant to students from different cultures". ❋ Unknown (2006)

That non sequitur is refuted by the Constitution's plain language, which empowers Congress to ratify treaties, declare war, fund and regulate military forces, and make laws "necessary and proper" for the execution of all presidential powers. ❋ Unknown (2006)

That non sequitur is refuted by the Constitution’s plain language …. ❋ Unknown (2006)

Her genius is for the non sequitur, which is why she's happy to have stopped making movies for a while. ❋ Unknown (2008)

It's a verbal technique based on Neuro-Linguistic Programming, and it's based on the use of non sequitur, which is French for "a word that makes no sense and freaks people out." ❋ Unknown (2006)

And so forth, to the astonishment of the auditory, who did not exactly see the 'sequitur' in either instance. ❋ Browning, Robert, 1812-1889 (1898)

It’s a verbal technique based on Neuro-Linguistic Programming, and it’s based on the use of non sequitur, which is French for “a word that makes no sense and freaks people out.” ❋ Unknown (2006)

No, to head off the predictable non-sequitur, this is not something that primarily pertains to poor people or those with dark skin. ❋ Unknown (2010)

Their reasoning is a non sequitur: The Constitution empowers each chamber to “determine the rules of its proceedings.” ❋ Unknown (2010)

As stated, the response appears to be a non sequitur. ❋ Unknown (2010)

This, like most of your argument, is just a non-sequitur. ❋ Unknown (2010)

Their reasoning is a non-sequitur: The constitution limits Federal power in many areas. ❋ Unknown (2010)

Their reasoning is a non-sequitur: if stupid people find the arguments convincing, the arguments must be strong. ❋ Unknown (2010)