He points out that there is no difficulty in believing in the existence of such a moth as F. Müller had described (_Nature_, 1873, p. 223), a Brazilian sphinx-moth with a trunk 10 to 11 in. in length. ❋ James Marchant (N/A)
He points out that there is no difficulty in believing in the existence of such a moth as F. Mueller had described (Nature, 1873, p. 223), a Brazilian sphinx-moth with a trunk 10 to 11 in. in length. ❋ Marchant, James (1916)
The sphinx-moth again, one of the lesser of the group. ❋ William Hamilton Gibson (1873)
Gray's surmise, 188; sphinx-moth its only complement, 190; manner of carrying the pollen by sphinx-moth, 193; extracting the pollen with a pencil; length of the nectary, 196; purple-fringed, 198; ragged, 200; very exceptional provision, 201; yellow-spiked, 203; moccasin-flower; ladies'-slipper; ❋ William Hamilton Gibson (1873)
Hence we infer the sphinx-moth to be the insect complement to the blossom, and we may correctly infer, moreover, that the flower is thus a night-bloomer. ❋ William Hamilton Gibson (1873)
Blossoms whose functions, through long eras of adaptation, have gradually shaped themselves to the forms of certain chosen insect sponsors; blossoms whose chalices are literally fashioned to bees or butterflies; blossoms whose slender, prolonged nectaries invite and reward the murmuring sphinx-moth alone, the floral throat closely embracing his head while it attaches its pollen masses to the bulging eyes, or perchance to the capillary tongue! ❋ William Hamilton Gibson (1873)
Angræcum, its long nectary, 219; tongue of a sphinx-moth eleven inches long, 220; nectary thirteen inches long, 223. ❋ William Hamilton Gibson (1873)
But victory complete and demoralizing to his opponents awaited this oracular utterance when later a disciple of Darwin, led by the same spirit of faith and conviction, visited Madagascar, and was soon able to affirm that he had caught the moth, a huge sphinx-moth, and that its tongue measured eleven inches in length. ❋ William Hamilton Gibson (1873)
Here is one which presents a pair of tiny clubs to the sphinx-moth at its threshold, gluing them to its bulging eyes. ❋ William Hamilton Gibson (1873)
We see the same great law in the construction of the mouths of insect: what can be more different than the immensely long spiral proboscis of a sphinx-moth, the curious folded one of a bee or bug, and the great jaws of a beetle? ❋ Unknown (1859)
We see the same great law in the construction of the mouths of insects: what can be more different than the immensely long spiral proboscis of a sphinx-moth, the curious folded one of a bee or bug, and the great jaws of a beetle? — yet all these organs, serving for such different purposes, are formed by infinitely numerous modifications of an upper lip, mandibles, and two pairs of maxillae. ❋ Charles Darwin (1859)
We see the same great law in the construction of the mouths of insects: what can be more different than the immensely long spiral proboscis of a sphinx-moth, the curious folded one of a bee or bug, and the great jaws of ❋ Charles Darwin (1845)
He points out that there is no difficulty in believing in the existence of such a moth as F. Muller has described ( "Nature," 1873, page 223) -- a Brazilian sphinx-moth with a trunk of 10 to 11 inches in length. ❋ Charles Darwin (1845)
We see the same great law in the construction of the mouths of insects: what can be more different than the immensely long spiral proboscis of a sphinx-moth, the curious folded one of a bee or bug, and the great jaws of a beetle? ❋ Charles Darwin (1845)
