Sublates

This post synthesizes and sublates all previous discussion on the topic. ❋ Unknown (2009)

In Adonais, Shelley having, as Actaeon, transgressed "across the threshold" to be slain by his own "hunter's dart" [297] enacts the kill, which sublates his mythopoeia, raising it as "the One" to its abstract essence. ❋ Unknown (2008)

In so doing, it sublates the old natural-law approach into a richer, higher, more appealing synthesis characterized by a thoroughly biblical personalism. ❋ Mike L (2005)

They sublate not themselves mutually, not the one the other externally; but each sublates itself in itself, and is in its own self the contrary of itself. ❋ Unknown (2005)

Or else, consciousness of ajnâna constituting the nature of Brahman, which is admittedly pure consciousness, in the same way as the consciousness of false silver is terminated by that cognition which sublates the silver, so some terminating act of cognition would eventually put an end to Brahman's essential nature itself. ❋ George Thibaut (1881)

And with regard to the latter alternative we point out that the knowledge of the falsity of the world is contradictory to the non - knowledge which consists in the view of the reality of the world; the former knowledge therefore sublates the latter non-knowledge only, while the non-knowledge of the true nature of Brahman is not touched by it. ❋ George Thibaut (1881)

They do not say that true knowledge sublates this false world, as/S/a@nkara says, but that it enables the sage to extricate himself from the world -- the inferior mûrta rûpa of Brahman, to use an expression of the ❋ George Thibaut (1881)

You will perhaps rejoin that consciousness is not false because it (alone) is not sublatcd by that cognition which sublates everything else. ❋ George Thibaut (1881)

If on the other hand the non-existence of a thing is cognised at the same time and the same place where and when its existence is cognised, we have a mutual contradiction of two cognitions, and then the stronger one sublates the other cognition which thus comes to an end. ❋ George Thibaut (1881)

As the sublating act of cognition on which Release depends extends to everything with the exception of Brahman, it sublates the general defect due to causal Nescience, inclusive of the particular erroneous appearance of embodiedness: the latter being sublated in this way cannot persist. ❋ George Thibaut (1881)

As knowledge of the meaning of those texts sublates the entire false world distinct from Brahman, the injunction itself with all its adjuncts is seen to be something baseless. ❋ George Thibaut (1881)

This is the principle on which the relation between 'what sublates' and 'what is sublated' is decided everywhere. ❋ George Thibaut (1881)

In the case of the snake-rope, there arises a cognition of non-existence in connexion with the given place and time; hence there is contradiction, one judgment sublates the other and the sublated cognition comes to an end. ❋ George Thibaut (1881)

That this self-luminous Reality possesses no other attribute to be learned from scripture is admitted; for according to your opinion also scripture sublates everything that is not Brahman and merely superimposed on it. ❋ George Thibaut (1881)

Scripture, although based on a defect, yet sublates Perception in so far as it is the cause of a cognition which dispels all plurality apprehended through Perception, and thus is later in order than ❋ George Thibaut (1881)

This view, we maintain, is altogether erroneous, springs in fact from the neglect of distinguishing between persistence and non-persistence on the one hand, and the relation between what sublates and what is sublated on the other hand. ❋ George Thibaut (1881)

And we observe that even when there exists an antagonistic imagination (interfering with the rise of knowledge), information given by competent persons, the presence of characteristic marks (on which a correct inference may be based), and the like give rise to knowledge which sublates the erroneous imagination. ❋ George Thibaut (1881)

It is not considerations as to the equality of conflicting cognitions, as to their being dependent or independent, and so on, that determine which of the two sublates the other; if that were the case, the perception which presents to us the flame of the lamp as one only would not be sublated by the cognition arrived at by inference that there is a succession of different flames. ❋ George Thibaut (1881)

The ground is self-sublating and what it sublates itself toward, the result of its negation, is existence. ❋ Unknown (2009)