Such patterns are "supersensible" because they cannot be perceived through direct empirical observation of any particular synchronic moment: they are perpetually out of joint with any given moment of time. ❋ Unknown (2009)
It is for this reason that Marx describes it as a "supersensible" property - something whose existence can be intuited by reason, but which is not immediately accessible to synchronic sense-perception alone. ❋ Unknown (2009)
Like other "supersensible" categories, capital haunts the empirically observable process of commodity circulation - a social spectre with no body of its own. 1 Marx describes a plausible empiricist reaction from the perspective of commodity circulation to capital's apparently mysterious, occult qualities: ❋ Unknown (2009)
This is the realm of the "supersensible" categories of value and abstract labour. ❋ Unknown (2009)
"supersensible" patterns that are generated beneath the flux of appearance. ❋ Unknown (2009)
We have seen his answer to the first question: I can know this world as revealed through the senses, but not the total sum of all that is (since the senses never reveal that) nor a world beyond this one (a supersensible world). ❋ Williams, Garrath (2009)
Their conviction that human reason could acquire knowledge of supersensible entities, including the soul and God, necessitated, in Kant's view, a “critique.” ❋ Wilson, Catherine (2008)
The soul is not a supersensible object of whose faculties and powers we can acquire knowledge but an idea that makes our practice of ascribing experiences to ourselves intelligible. ❋ Wilson, Catherine (2008)
Although there is an incalculable gulf fixed between the domain of the concept of nature, as the sensible, and the domain of the concept of freedom, as the supersensible, so that from the former to the latter ❋ Guyer, Paul (2007)
Moreover, some true premises are not necessarily arrived at rationally--certainly not in the case of supersensible knowledge or revealed wisdom. ❋ Tusar N Mohapatra (2006)
Genius is the naturalist or geographer of the supersensible regions, and draws their map; and, by acquainting us with new fields of activity, cools our affection for the old. ❋ Unknown (2006)
He saw that the globe of earth was not more lawful and precise than was the supersensible; that a celestial geometry was in place there, as ❋ Unknown (2006)
Now back to the topic at hand: language, God, and the trans-logic of supersensible domains. ❋ Tusar N Mohapatra (2006)
Kant finds the explanation of genius in “the supersensible substrate of all the subjects unattainable by any concept of understanding, and consequently in that which forms the point of reference for the harmonious accord of all our faculties of cognition...” ❋ Tusar N Mohapatra (2006)
These attempts have, predictably, always led to assertions about the “real” existence of supersensible undetectable objects, even parallel worlds. ❋ Sean (2005)
While experience does not allow us to identify either nature's ultimate end or its final end, Kant argues on a priori grounds that the final end of nature can only be man considered as a moral subject, that is, considered as having the supersensible ability to choose ends freely ❋ Ginsborg, Hannah (2005)
“Just because there is in our imagination a striving to advance to the infinite, while in our reason there lies a claim to absolute totality, as to a real idea, the very inadequacy of our faculty for estimating the magnitude of the things in the sensible world [viz., imagination] awakens the feeling of a supersensible faculty in us” (§25, 250). ❋ Ginsborg, Hannah (2005)
In the case of both notions, the experience of the sublime consists in a feeling of the superiority of our own power of reason, as a supersensible faculty, over nature ❋ Ginsborg, Hannah (2005)