We can certainly see that this flexibility of the theoretics is convenient, it sure doesn't inspire confidence in its explanatory power. ❋ Unknown (2006)
But the optimistic mouthpieces of the great American people, who are themselves deft theoreticians, are not to be convinced by mere theoretics. ❋ Unknown (2010)
You, a master of books, by all the sea-blood in your body should be able to pick up the theoretics of navigation while I snap my fingers. ❋ Unknown (2010)
I have pointed out many times that science has done all the reduction it can do and still be within the realm of extant valid physical theoretics. ❋ Unknown (2008)
Joy: I have pointed out many times that science has done all the reduction it can do and still be within the realm of extant valid physical theoretics. ❋ Unknown (2008)
OOL has yet to establish anything like a cell yielding to natural selection theoretics. ❋ Unknown (2008)
He gave us some special insight into whether or not some of the theoretics discussed in the lectures we're actually true as someone who actually lives with that architecture. ❋ Unknown (2008)
We can describe mechanisms – variation, selection and all the newer mechanisms being documented from the field and described in developing, expanding theoretics. ❋ Unknown (2008)
Much of high-end theoretics in particle physics (under the umbrella of RQFT), does grudgingly accept the Aspect falsification of Bell's inequality theorem – thus the actuality of quantum non-locality (a.k.a. entanglement). ❋ Unknown (2008)
It's not science yet, but as it continues to develop with conceptions of front-loading and endogenous adaptive mutagenesis – boosted by incoming research by biologists armed with new technological tools on the no-longer forbidden subject of causation, and encouraged by developing theoretics of consciousness from a well-funded and star-studded multidisciplinary quest – it's still a real threat to the NDS status quo because it not only CAN make predictions related to causation, it DOES. ❋ Unknown (2007)
It might be that non-culture warriors are just sick of ignorant, antiquated theoretics and want to know what's really going on. ❋ Unknown (2007)
Penrose, Stapp and others at the forefront of the theoretics know they will not live long enough to see the answers. ❋ Unknown (2007)
Most care not a bit what atheists and theists might conclude about metaphysical supports from their designed-to-be provisional theoretics. ❋ Unknown (2007)
I believe the crafts of writing can be taught, the theoretics of writing can be explored in a classroom, and vocational skills can be honed. ❋ DAVID BISHOP (2009)
Which we don't understand at all, and may be something entirely different from our theoretics. ❋ Unknown (2007)
Penrose isn't really all that interested in kudos or million-dollar prizes, or even 'proving' his theoretics to the upstarts. ❋ Unknown (2007)
