Genera

Besides these modes, the Greeks had what they called genera, of which there were three -- the diatonic, to which the examples already given belong; the chromatic, in which the tetrachord had the form of mi, fa, fi, la, the interval between the two upper tones being equal to a step and a half; and the enharmonic, in which the first two intervals were one-quarter of a step and the upper one a major third. ❋ Unknown (1874)

The new name for the sub genera is a IIWBETOSISTTCOEBNWHAPSAKOTC which stands for: ❋ Unknown (2006)

On this idea of the natural system being, in so far as it has been perfected, genealogical in its arrangement, with the grades of difference between the descendants from a common parent, expressed by the terms genera, families, orders, &c., we can understand the rules which we are compelled to follow in our classification. ❋ Unknown (2006)

On this idea of the natural system, being, in so far as it has been perfected, genealogical in its arrangement, with the grades of difference expressed by the terms genera, families, orders, &c., we can understand the rules which we are compelled to follow in our classification. ❋ Unknown (1909)

On this idea of the natural system being, in so far as it has been perfected, genealogical in its arrangement, with the grades of difference between the descendants from a common parent, expressed by the terms genera, families, orders, etc., we can understand the rules which we are compelled to follow in our classification. ❋ Charles Darwin (1859)

[2] [3] established for the first time a widely acceptable and fruitful set of principles for classifying plants and animals into the groupings we know as genera (separate groups comprising few or many closely related species). ❋ Unknown (2009)

[1] [2] established for the first time a widely acceptable and fruitful set of principles for classifying plants and animals into the groupings we know as genera (separate groups comprising few or many closely related species). ❋ Unknown (2009)

But then he presents the genera in the particulars and the genera after the particulars in a manner which seems to differ from Ammonius™ account, for he seems to treat them as two subdivisions of one class of genera, which is distinguished from the genera before the particulars by being later-born ❋ Ierodiakonou, Katerina (2008)

And thus all propositions wherein more comprehensive words, called genera, are affirmed of subordinate or less comprehensive, called species, or individuals, are barely verbal. ❋ Unknown (2007)

While they are from two different genera, which is botanically correct, in the US they are distributed as one group. ❋ Fer (2007)

Such instances, however, are of very great service for the discovery of forms; because as striking instances lead easily to specific differences, so are clandestine instances the best guides to genera, that is, to those common natures whereof the natures proposed are nothing more than particular cases. ❋ Unknown (2005)

For if the universals are always more of the nature of principles, evidently the uppermost of the genera are the principles; for these are predicated of all things. ❋ Aristotle (2002)

But if unity and being are not genera, neither will they be principles, if the genera are the principles. ❋ Aristotle (2002)